Embedded Files
Project Triangle
The Challenge
The Challenge
In the fast-paced world of project management, you are constantly hit with changes. Whether itβs a slashed budget, a rushed deadline, or scope creep, something has to give. Most learners memorize the terms but struggle to apply the logic when the pressure is on.
The Interactive Solution
This module moves beyond definitions. Using three "real-world" scenarios, you must decide which lever to pull - Time, Cost, or Scope - to keep a project from collapsing.
Click a scenario below to launch the simulation. As the Project Manager, how would you re-balance the triple constraints to ensure project success?
Scenario 1: Beat the Competitor Rush
Scenario 1: Beat the Competitor Rush
The launch date just moved up by three weeks.
Scenario 2: Mid-Project Budget Cut
Scenario 2: Mid-Project Budget Cut
You lost 20% of your funding, but the deliverables are legally required.
Scenario 3: One More Thing Request
Scenario 3: One More Thing Request
Stakeholders want to add a major new feature without changing the launch date.
Question 1: Beat the Competitor Rush - With the launch date moved up (Time) and the budget frozen (Cost), the triangle is under extreme pressure. To ensure a functional product is delivered in three weeks, which action must you take?
Increase Scope: Add more features to outshine the competitor's launch.
Decrease Scope: Identify "must-have" vs. "nice-to-have" features and cut the latter.
Ignore the Triangle: Keep the original plan and hope the team works 20-hour days.
Correct Answer: 2 β Decrease Scope. When two sides of the triangle are fixed (Time and Cost), the third side (Scope) must adjust to compensate. Attempting to keep the original scope would likely result in a "Quality" collapse, leading to a buggy or failed launch.
Question 2: Mid-Project Budget Cut - With a 30% budget reduction (Cost) and a fixed feature list (Scope), what is the most logical adjustment to keep the project from failing?
Increase Time: Extend the deadline to account for fewer resources.
Decrease Time: Rush the remaining staff to work twice as fast.
Increase Scope: Add more features to prove the project's value despite the cut.
Correct Answer: 1 β Increase Time. Budget directly funds resources (people and tools). When you have fewer resources but the same amount of work, that work will inevitably take longer to complete.
Question 3: One More Thing Request - With a 30% budget reduction (Cost) and a fixed feature list (Scope), what is the most logical adjustment to keep the project from failing?
Increase Time: Extend the deadline to account for fewer resources.
Decrease Time: Rush the remaining staff to work twice as fast.
Increase Scope: Add more features to prove the project's value despite the cut.
Correct Answer: 1 β Increase Time. Budget directly funds resources (people and tools). When you have fewer resources but the same amount of work, that work will inevitably take longer to complete.
About This Course
Development Spotlight:
Logic Mapping: Triple Constraint Theory - Engineered three distinct branching paths to demonstrate the mathematical reality of project trade-offs.
Animation: Camtasia - Created custom motion graphics of the triangle "stretching" and "collapsing" to provide visual feedback for learner choices.
Asset Assembly: Clipchamp - Used for rapid sequencing of scenario hooks and audio synchronization.
Engagement: Scenario-Based Learning (SBL) - Shifted from passive terminology memorization to active decision-making under pressure.
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse